Greenhouse vs Workable
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026, Ranked. Last verified June 9, 2026.
The short answer
Greenhouse ranks higher on Top 11 (#1 vs #3) for Recruiters and HR managing hiring pipelines. The gold standard for scalable, structured, and data-driven enterprise recruiting.
At a glance
| Greenhouse | Workable | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #1 / 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026, Ranked | #3 / 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026, Ranked |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Best for | Structured, scalable enterprise hiring | All-in-one for SMBs |
| Pricing | $$$$ (Custom pricing) | $$$ ($149 to $719/mo+) |
| HQ | New York, USA | Boston, USA |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
Greenhouse
The gold standard for scalable, structured, and data-driven enterprise recruiting.
www.greenhouse.comSee full entry in 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026, Ranked
Workable
The best user-friendly, all-in-one ATS for small and mid-sized businesses.
www.workable.comSee full entry in 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026, Ranked
Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.